Q.3. There is also a point of view that Agriculture Produce Marketing
Committees (APMCs) set up under the state acts have not only impeded the
development of agriculture but also have been the cause of food inflation in
India. Critically examine.
Ans: The given point of view clearly highlights
the failure of APMCs in supervising and monitoring the activities of regulated
market and thus in protecting the interests of farmers.
APMCs
have been set up by various states to monitor the activities of regulated
market. The committee has representatives of state government, farmers,
traders, commission agents and local body. The chairman of the committee is
always a farmer. The main objective of this committee is to protect the farmers
from the misery of distress sale to middlemen.
The committee has been
entrusted with the task of providing storage facilities to farmers in regulated
market. The committee also ensures that no broker or middlemen operates in
regulated market. Only registered traders are allowed to purchase agriculture
produce from farmers and that too at pre-announced prices. Weights &
measures of traders operating in regulated market are always inspected and
farmers are provided training by APMC to conduct business in regulated market.
Regulated market structure set
up in India by respective state governments since 1951 under their respective
APMCs acts has over the years brought discipline in the marketing of
agriculture produce and taking care of various problems relating to
malfunctioning of agricultural market.
But over the years, it has been found that
APMCs have failed to discharge their responsibilities. Farmers are not
adequately informed about prevailing prices, weight & measures are not
regularly inspected and training program conducted to increase the efficiency of
market is irregular and unsatisfactory. There have been reports of collusion
among various members of committee leading to rampant corruption in regulated
market. All these along with the inefficiency of APMCs, farmers are denied fair
and remunerative prices at the cost of agricultural development.
The APMC act is also responsible for food
inflation as it has created monopolies and distributional inefficiencies by not
permitting private players and unregistered traders to set up the wholesale
market in areas designated as regulated market by states. The committee also
charges heavy mandi fee from traders as
well as farmers of regulated market. This also becomes the cause of inflation. Since the
time fruits and vegetables have been brought under the ambit of regulated
market, food inflation has increased further.
However, under model APMC acts,2003, private
players have been allowed to purchase agricultural produce and develop
agricultural infrastructure such as cold storage. Farmers are also sponsoring their
own market in various states. These developments have brought in competition in
agricultural market and thereby increasing the efficiency of APMCs. Vashistha Ray.
No comments:
Post a Comment